| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200712111438.51142.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:38:50 +0100 From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2007 schrieb Avi Kivity: > KVM is due to receive support for multiple architectures (ppc, ia64, and > s390, in addition to the existing x86), hopefully in time for the 2.6.25 > merge window. It is awkward to place the new arch support in > drivers/kvm/, so I'd like to propose the following new layout: > > virt/ top-level directory for hypervisors > virt/kvm/ kvm common code > virt/lguest/ the other hypervisor > arch/*/kvm/ arch dependent kvm code > include/linux/kvm.h arch independent interface > include/asm/kvm.h arch dependent interface > include/linux/kvm_para.h arch independent guest interface > include/asm/kvm_para.h arch dependent guest interface > > The include/ hierarchy is already in place; I'm including it for > completeness. For completeness, where do we want to put the drivers? drivers/*, drivers/net/* etc. or drivers/kvm/* drivers/xen/* etc. Christian? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists