[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071210163736.GA6107@ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:37:37 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@...hat.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ray Lee <ray@...rabbit.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@...schlus.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much?
On Wed 2007-12-05 09:49:34, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 08:26:19AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> > Ok, whats going on here is an issue with how the smolt RPM installs the
> > UUID and how Fedora's Live CD does an install. It's a complete false alarm
> > on the kernel side, sorry for the confusion.
>
> BTW, You may be better off using "uuidgen -t" to generate the UUID in
> the smolt RPM, since that will use 12 bits of randomness from
> /dev/random, plus the MAC, address and timestamp. So even if there is
> zero randomness in /dev/random, and the time is January 1, 1970, at
> least the MAC will contribute some uniqueness to the UUID.
I thought that /dev/random blocks when 0 entropy is available...? I'd
expect uuid generation to block, not to issue duplicates.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists