[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475EB7AC.9040903@qumranet.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:15:40 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 11:47:39AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> KVM is due to receive support for multiple architectures (ppc, ia64, and
>> s390, in addition to the existing x86), hopefully in time for the 2.6.25
>> merge window. It is awkward to place the new arch support in
>> drivers/kvm/, so I'd like to propose the following new layout:
>>
>> virt/ top-level directory for hypervisors
>> virt/kvm/ kvm common code
>> virt/lguest/ the other hypervisor
>> arch/*/kvm/ arch dependent kvm code
>>
>
> The arch/*/dir shall use same dir-name as used
> in top-level directory.
>
Well, it isn't like that now (arch/x86/oprofile, etc.)
> So use arch/*/virt/kvm/ if kvm really requires
> a subdirectory of it own. Preferably not.
> A handful of files named kvm* does not warrant their own
> subdirectory IMO.
>
>
We'll have 5-6 x86 specific files.
Where do you suggest we place them?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists