[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475EC246.10205@reed.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:00:54 -0500
From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com>,
David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>,
Paul Rolland <rol@...917.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, rol@...be.net
Subject: Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64
with MCP51 laptops
Which port do you want me to test? Also, I can run the timing test on
my machine if you share the source code so I can build it.
Rene Herman wrote:
> On 11-12-07 17:30, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
>> Anyways it looks like the discussion here is going in a
>> a loop. I had hoped David would post his test results with
>> another port so that we know for sure that the bus aborts (and not
>> port 80) is the problem on his box. But it looks like
>> he doesn't want to do this. Still removing the bus aborts
>> is probably the correct way to go forward.
>
> Yes, I do also still want to know that. David (Reed)?
>
>> Only needs a patch now. If nobody beats me to it i'll
>> add one later to my tree.
>
> Pavel Machek already posted one. His udelay(8) wants to be less -- 1
> or "to be safe" perhaps 2.
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/9/131
>
> Rene.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists