[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071210.171759.78444664.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:17:59 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: julia@...u.dk
Cc: fpavlic@...ibm.com, wangchen@...fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Fix use of skb after netif_rx
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:05:30 +0100 (CET)
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
>
> Recently, Wang Chen submitted a patch
> (d30f53aeb31d453a5230f526bea592af07944564) to move a call to netif_rx(skb)
> after a subsequent reference to skb, because netif_rx may call kfree_skb on
> its argument. netif_rx_ni calls netif_rx, so the same problem occurs in
> the files below.
>
> I have left the updating of dev->last_rx after the calls to netif_rx_ni
> because it seems time dependent, but moved the other field updates before.
>
> This was found using the following semantic match.
> (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
...
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists