linux-kernel - Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:14 -0800
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	"Phillip Susi" <psusi@....rr.com>
Cc:	"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>, "Matt Mackall" <mpm@...enic.com>,
	"Marc Haber" <mh+linux-kernel@...schlus.de>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	"Alan Cox" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much?

On Dec 11, 2007 11:46 AM, Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com> wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
> > Note that even paranoid applicatons should not be using /dev/random
> > for session keys; again, /dev/random isn't magic, and entropy isn't
> > unlimited. Instead, such an application should pull 16 bytes or so,
> > and then use it to seed a cryptographic random number generator.
>
> What good does using multiple levels of RNG do?  Why seed one RNG from
> another?  Wouldn't it be better to have just one RNG that everybody
> uses?

Not all applications need cryptographically secure random numbers.
Sometimes, you just want a random number to seed your game RNG or a
monte carlo simulator.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/