lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:51:22 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, mel@....ul.ie, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, rientjes@...gle.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, clameter@....com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Use two zonelists per node instead of multiple zonelists v11r2 On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:21:57 +0000 (GMT) Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote: > This is a rebase of the two-zonelist patchset to 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 and some > warnings cleared up. Sorry, but I don't think I'll be looking at anything which looks like it isn't a bugfix for a while. I'm swamped in regressions (and everyone else should be too) but also we need to look at why there were so many regressions - people jamming way too much inadequately tested stuff into the 2.6.24 merge window. The only way we can fix that is to merge less stuff and to more carefully review and test the things which we _do_ plan on merging. Part of that process is for me to get more -mm kernels out and to test them more and to encourage more people to test them and to report and fix problems. But I've hardly looked at the -mm queue in a week because of 2.6.24 regressions. argh. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists