linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071211010125.75e2e807@inria.fr>
Date:	Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:01:25 +0100
From:	Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, rjw@...k.pl,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:

> the frequency of both cores is the maximum of what linux sets each core to;

Do you mean that the cpufreq code can be confused about the actual
frequency of the cores? That sounds like a big problem.

Thanks for any insight.

-- 
Guillaume
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/