linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Intel Management Engine Interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:00:24 -0500
From:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
To:	Anas Nashif <nashif@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel Management Engine Interface

Anas Nashif wrote:
>
> Actually no TCP/IP is needed here. Basically the MEI driver writes and reads the
> messages to/from the firmware. When communicating in-band using LMS, TCP/IP
> terminates at LMS and the messages are copied using MEI driver.
> 
>>> To have a feel for all of this, with many examples, samples and documentation
>>> you can download the AMT 3.0 SDK (google: intel amt sdk).
>> I would be more interested right now how the kernel can use this without
>> additional user space support. Any ideas on this? 
> 
> I will dig for some documents on that.
..

Sample code for storing a trace_back() would be much better.

-ml
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/