[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 09:29:06 -0700
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, matthew@....cx,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, drzeus@...eus.cx,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Adam Belay <ambx1@....rr.com>,
Matthieu Castet <castet.matthieu@...e.fr>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 01:16:10 am Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:25:57 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com> wrote:
>
> > Andrew, can you add this before
> > pnp-request-ioport-and-iomem-resources-used-by-active-devices.patch?
> >
> > ...
> >
> > PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path
>
> I did, but I also temporarily dropped
> pnp-request-ioport-and-iomem-resources-used-by-active-devices.patch.
Thanks.
> Is it expected that this patch will fix
> pnp-request-ioport-and-iomem-resources-used-by-active-devices.patch?
> Should I bring it back?
No, not yet. The "do not stop/start" patch should fix the kernel/resource.c
warning, but I don't understand the "acpi reboots machine" (critical temp
reached) problem yet.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists