[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:39:25 +0100
From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A peek at the future of storage
On Mit, 2007-12-12 at 10:02 -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 09:46, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
[...]
> > People have proposed writing a daemon that just reads
> > /proc/net/rpc/nfsd periodically and uses that to adjust the number of
> > threads from userspace, probably subject to some limits in a config
> > file someplace. (Think that could do the job, or is there some reason
[...]
> So how would a userspace daemon know that kernel is blocking and new
> threads are needed? In kernel this is pretty easy: when a new request
> arrives, look on the thread list and if none are available, generate a
> new one. Something special needs to be done to handle the case where
> there are no threads available because they are all piled up on a
> semaphore due to, for example, somebody unplugging the network cable
> for a remote disk. We have to avoid generating infinite threads in
> that case. Ideas?
Add a sysctl configurable maximum number of NFS threads and default it
to 8 (or whatever now the default value is).
And one wants probably some logic to kill them again if they are not
used long enough. And then you need/want another variable for the
minimum number of NFS threads around.
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists