[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1197539953.4729.19.camel@gaivota>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:59:13 -0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: Shane <gnome42@...il.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Brandon Philips <brandon@...p.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
video4linux-list <video4linux-list@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] videobuf-core.c locking fixes
> > e1f8b4a49d86746f699919531c17fd154787e308
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c b/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c
> > index 81f77d2..c8a5cb5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/video/videobuf-core.c
> > @@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ ssize_t videobuf_read_stream(struct videobuf_queue *q,
> > if (q->streaming)
> > goto done;
> > if (!q->reading) {
> > - retval = videobuf_read_start(q);
> > + retval = __videobuf_read_start(q);
> > if (retval < 0)
> > goto done;
> > }
> > @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ unsigned int videobuf_poll_stream(struct file *file,
> > struct videobuf_buffer, stream);
> > } else {
> > if (!q->reading)
> > - videobuf_read_start(q);
> > + __videobuf_read_start(q);
> > if (!q->reading) {
> > rc = POLLERR;
> > } else if (NULL == q->read_buf) {
> >
>
> Yes it does! I was just going to send the same patch myself :)
The patch seems ok to my eyes. I dunno why I forgot to replace those two occurrences on my patch :(
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists