[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071213101144.GA61767@xs4all.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:11:44 +0100
From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@...tron.nl>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@...tron.nl>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, matthew@....cx,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Anders Henke <anders.henke@...d1.de>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] dpt_i2o: don't set DMA_64BIT_MASK [was: Re: [stable] broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2 check page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)]
According to Greg KH:
> So, what should be added to 2.6.23-stable then? And, can I get a real
> changelog entry for it?
This is suitable for both 2.6.23.x and 2.6.24-rc5 :
linux-2.6-dpt_i2o-no-dma64.patch
The dpt_i2o driver can't handle 64 bit DMA addresses, so do not
let it set pci_set_dma_mask(pDev, DMA_64BIT_MASK) .
Signed-off-by: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@...tron.nl>
diff -ruN linux-2.6.23.9.orig/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c linux-2.6.23.9/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c
--- linux-2.6.23.9.orig/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c 2007-11-26 18:51:43.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.23.9/drivers/scsi/dpt_i2o.c 2007-12-12 13:21:05.000000000 +0100
@@ -905,8 +905,7 @@
}
pci_set_master(pDev);
- if (pci_set_dma_mask(pDev, DMA_64BIT_MASK) &&
- pci_set_dma_mask(pDev, DMA_32BIT_MASK))
+ if (pci_set_dma_mask(pDev, DMA_32BIT_MASK))
return -EINVAL;
base_addr0_phys = pci_resource_start(pDev,0);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists