[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4761896B.7070801@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:35:07 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: gallatin@...i.com, joonwpark81@...il.com, auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: napi fix
David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:02:25 -0500
>
>
>> Or perhaps we should just leave things as is.
>>
>
> We should probably add a "disabling" state bit to the
> napi struct flags, this will be set by napi_disable()
> before it loops trying to set the sched bit.
>
> net_rx_action() can then check this.
>
How about allowing a return value of -1 from napi_poll and letting device
check itself.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists