[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071213204219.GF25130@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:42:19 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Paul E McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
Ted Tso <tytso@...ibm.com>, dvhltc@...ibm.com,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, bunk@...nel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@...edesktop.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] RCU: Preemptible-RCU
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>
> >
> > Currently it is based against the latest linux-2.6-sched-devel.git
> >
> > Awaiting your feedback!
>
> Hi Gautham,
>
> Thanks for posting this. I believe this is the same version of preempt
> RCU as we have in the RT patch. It seems to be very stable. I ran the
> RT patch version of the RCU Preempt (just the Preempt RCU patches
> without RT on latest git) on a 64way box and the results seems just as
> good (if not slightly better) than classic RCU! I'll rerun this patch
> series on that box and post the results.
>
> >From what I'm seening with this, is that it is ready for mainline.
> >These
> patches should probably go into -mm and be ready for 2.6.25. If Andrew
> wants to wait for my results, I'll run them tonight.
>
> Thanks Gautham, Paul and Dipankar for all this great work!
Steve, if you went with a fine comb over the code and have done a
thorough review, could you send me your Reviewed-by line for this
patchset?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists