[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712131251300.18314@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:53:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: What was the problem with quicklists and x86-64?
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > These issues only exist with NUMA because of the freeing of off node pages
> > before the TLB flush was done. There was a discussion about this issue and
> > my fix of simply not freeing the offnode pages early was ignored. Instead
> > the x86_64 implementation (which has no problems that I know of) was
> > pulled leaving the issue open in the core. Benjamin Herrrenschmidt
> > wanted to take a look at these issues (CCing him).
>
> I don't know how NUMA gets in the picture there, it's probably very x86
> specific thing. The issue we have here happens on other platforms
> unrelated to NUMA. The fact that is tired to NUMA on x86 might be due to
> the way the HW tablewalk operates on these.
This is a generic NUMA issue here! Quicklist pages that are not on
the current node are freed without waiting for the TLB flush. The patch
that I posted fixes that by requiring that all pages be flushed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists