[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071213213710.GB25563@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:37:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark timer_stats as incompatible with multiple pid
namespaces
* Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> >> Well struct pid * works in that case if you grab the reference to
> >> it.
> >
> > but the display of the stats might happen much later. The point of
> > this API is to save pid+comm, which gives users a good idea about
> > what caused the events in the past - without having to pin any
> > resource of that task.
>
> Likewise struct pid is designed not to be a problem if pinned. It is a
> little heavier then it used to be with the addition of pid namespace
> support but not much. And if it is to heavy struct pid needs to be
> fixed.
>
> Holding the struct pid very much does not pin the task struct, and it
> shouldn't pin any other resources. I agree 64bytes or so is a bit
> more to pin then 4 bytes but it really isn't a lot.
yeah, and i have no conceptual objections - i just wanted to outline the
thinking behind /proc/timer_stats.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists