[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712131405390.25120@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:07:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tipc_init(), WARNING: at arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c:52,
[2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23]
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> unless i'm missing something obvious (and i easily might), i see SLUB as
> SLAB reimplemented with a different queueing model. Not "without
> queueing".
The "queue" that you are talking about is the freelist of a slab. It exist
for each slab. SLAB uses a table of free entries there. The freelist is
limited to a slab and thus the locality of the freelist is bound to
the same page which avoids NUMA locality checks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists