[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712131416280.25120@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:22:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers)
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> hackbench-10: 1.12 2.99 (166%)
> hackbench-20: 2.04 6.67 (226%)
> hackbench-50: 5.03 17.50 (247%)
>
> and hackbench overhead stands out, by a huge margin. Other stuff is
> within measurement noise. Neither SLUB nor SLAB debugging was turned on,
> all other debugging options were off too.
I just came back from vacation. The non linear growth of regression
indicates lock contention somewhere. Must be something special that was
triggered by hackbench.
We have had a regression like that in 2.6.24 before due to order 1 allocs
in the network layer. The .24 modifications for SLUB introduced page
allocator pass through for allocations > PAGESIZE/2. Order 1 allocs could
serialize on zone locks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists