[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071213224111.GI21616@stusta.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:41:11 +0100
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: remove __read_mostly
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> writes:
> >
> > -rwxrwxr-x 1 bunk bunk 46607243 2007-12-13 19:50 vmlinux.old
> > -rwxrwxr-x 1 bunk bunk 46598691 2007-12-13 21:55 vmlinux
>
> File sizes are useless -- check size output.
text data bss dec hex filename
29268488 3697961 5222400 38188849 246b731 vmlinux.old
29268435 3685565 5228784 38192784 246c690 vmlinux
> > It's not a surprise that the kernel can become bigger when __read_mostly
> > gets used, especially in cases where __read_mostly prevents gcc
> > optimizations.
>
> What optimizations do you think it prevents? I don't think it
> should change the gcc generated code at all; the only difference
> should be to the linker.
What I have seen recently was a static variable marked __read_mostly
being read-only with some CONFIG_DEBUG_FOO=n.
With __read_mostly gcc feeled obliged to emit a variable.
Without __read_mostly, gcc optimized the variable away.
> -Andi
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists