linux-kernel - Re: What was the problem with quicklists and x86-64?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1197587969.15741.191.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:19:28 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: What was the problem with quicklists and x86-64?


On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 15:14 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
> > We have a separate batch to store page table pages with an RCU head on
> > it, we fire it off when it's full or when tlb gather is complete.
> 
> full? You need to wait otill the tlb gather is complete.

No, we fire it off with RCU, we don't need to wait for TLB gather to be
complete. All we care about is sync with other CPUs doing a page table
walk and it's enough for us. We do -not- need to synchronize with TLB
invalidations and we don't use IPIs for those anyway.

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/