[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1197523199.3410.1.camel@sli10-desk.sh.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:19:59 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: mel@....ul.ie, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [RFC] move free page back to MIGRATE_MOVABLE?
pages are MIGRATE_MOVABLE initially, and fallback to other types. If the
pages are freed, I wonder why not move them back to MIGRATE_MOVABLE.
This, for example, can help memory remove.
Thanks,
Shaohua
Index: linux/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/page_alloc.c 2007-12-13 11:44:36.000000000 +0800
+++ linux/mm/page_alloc.c 2007-12-13 12:04:59.000000000 +0800
@@ -386,6 +386,9 @@ static inline int page_is_buddy(struct p
return 0;
}
+int move_freepages(struct zone *zone,
+ struct page *start_page, struct page *end_page,
+ int migratetype);
/*
* Freeing function for a buddy system allocator.
*
@@ -446,6 +449,17 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struc
list_add(&page->lru,
&zone->free_area[order].free_list[migratetype]);
zone->free_area[order].nr_free++;
+
+ if (order >= pageblock_order && migratetype != MIGRATE_MOVABLE) {
+ struct page *tmp = page;
+
+ move_freepages(zone, page, page + (1 << order) - 1, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
+
+ while (tmp < page + (1 << order)) {
+ set_pageblock_migratetype(tmp, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
+ tmp += pageblock_nr_pages;
+ }
+ }
}
static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists