linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c0942db0712140845p1dfd8b23va13525b75224f4c0@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:45:52 -0800
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	stefano.brivio@...imi.it,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...sta.com>, matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mbuesch@...enet.de, linux@...mer.net,
	"Michael Buesch" <mb@...sch.de>, kjwinchester@...il.com,
	jonathan@...masters.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	bcm43xx-dev@...ts.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex

On Dec 14, 2007 8:27 AM, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007 6:40 AM,  <stefano.brivio@...imi.it> wrote:
> > Agreed. As a b43legacy maintainer, I'd be happy to know if Ingo
> > suggests other ways to smooth out the transition. I haven't read
> > proposals yet.
>
> This isn't rocket science guys. Put a file in somewhere in your tree
> called ReleaseAnnouncement or something, and ask Linus to adjust his
> kernel release process to include the contents of `cat $( find . -name
> ReleaseAnnouncement )` in the release message he sends out. Clear out
> the file after the release.
>
> Include things such as "bcm43xx is scheduled for removal. build both
> b43 and b43legacy as a replacement. Be sure to download the latest
> firmware from $URL and follow the instructions there to extract the
> correct latest firmware necessary for your chip. There are known
> incompatibilities with old udev versions, please ensure blah blah
> blah."

Or even better, keep the history, and show the diff of the old versus
new in the release announcement, with an appropriate sed 's/+/ /' or
somesuch.

<shrug> I'm sure you all will figure something out. Regardless, my
point is a higher level changelog that is human readable would be
helpful. (There are thousands of per-commit changelog entries to read,
it's beyond what I have the time to do when testing a new kernel).
Also, it seems distributing the release announcement work would be as
helpful as distributing the code development work.

Ray
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/