[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4762CBB6.5030301@rtr.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:30:14 -0500
From: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
lkml@....ca, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments (improved)
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:42:37PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> Regrettably this interferes with anti-fragmentation because the "next" page
>> on the list on return from rmqueue_bulk is not guaranteed to be of the right
>> mobility type. I fixed it as an additional patch but it adds additional cost
>> that should not be necessary and it's visible in microbenchmark results on
>> at least one machine.
>
> Is this patch to be preferred to the one Andrew Morton posted to do
> list_for_each_entry_reverse?
..
This patch replaces my earlier patch that Andrew has:
- list_add(&page->lru, list);
+ list_add_tail(&page->lru, list);
Which, in turn, replaced the even-earlier list_for_each_entry_reverse patch.
-ml
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists