[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4762D005.5060800@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:48:37 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix problems due to use of "outb" to port 80
on some AMD64x2 laptops, etc.
Alan Cox wrote:
>>> i dont think this should matter: old systems that truly _need_ the ISA
>>> delay will be slow enough to not trip up. (nor are they really affected
>>> by these early delays - the delays were more for crappy ISA devices that
>>> get initialized later down, when the delay loop is already calibrated)
>> 8253 (DMAC) and 8254 (PIT) have been reported in earlier versions of the
>> thread. By Alan, I believe.
>
> They've been seen to be problems up to PII era machines. I'm not aware of
> any newer than that with this problem. We also don't need to touch the
> DMAC that early anyway that I can see - just the PIT.
>
> In fact if we have a fast processor we have a TSC and APIC so we don't
> need the PIT ?
Well, the TSC may be unstable and the APIC may be disabled.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists