[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1197593849.3154.62.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:57:29 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Mark Lord <liml@....ca>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
lkml@....ca, matthew@....cx, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments (improved)
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 19:46 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> "Improved version", more similar to the 2.6.23 code:
>
> Fix page allocator to give better chance of larger contiguous segments (again).
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@...ox.com
> ---
>
> --- old/mm/page_alloc.c 2007-12-13 19:25:15.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c 2007-12-13 19:43:07.000000000 -0500
> @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@
> struct page *page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype);
> if (unlikely(page == NULL))
> break;
> - list_add(&page->lru, list);
> + list_add_tail(&page->lru, list);
Could we put a big comment above this explaining to the would be vm
tweakers why this has to be a list_add_tail, so we don't end up back in
this position after another two years?
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists