linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/30] blk_end_request: changing ub (take 4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071214114938.b87883af.zaitcev@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:49:38 -0800
From:	Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
To:	Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
Cc:	jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@...hat.com, j-nomura@...jp.nec.com, zaitcev@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/30] blk_end_request: changing ub (take 4)

On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:04:54 -0500 (EST), Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com> wrote:

> I have investigated all code paths which call ub_end_rq() in ub.c,
> and confirmed that ub_end_rq() is always called with the queue lock
> held.  (sc->lock is registered as a queue lock.)

Thanks for reminding me about blk_init_queue, I forgot. Sorry for the
confusion.

Greetings,
-- Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/