[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071214200605.GA17424@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:06:05 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
> Well, that would interfere with the acpi-idle code.
How so? idle notifiers should work for acpi idle too.
> Anyway the idle notifiers is a pretty artificial interface which is on
> my get rid of it list anyway.
The original use cases were:
- Accounting for idle time with stopped counters in oprofile and eliminate
the need for idle=poll.
That never was implemented unfortunately but would be still a worthy
feature I think.
- Perfmon for similar uses.
- noidletick -- my original noidletick implementation used the idle
notifiers similar to the s390 implementation. Obsolete now.
Right now it is used for the machine check early notification, but I never
liked that (imho it just "fixes" a non problem only relevant
in non realistic testing situations) and it would be fine to drop that one
I think. In fact I already made it a config in the patchkit to use the 64bit
mce code on 32bit too.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists