[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071214232955.545ab809@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:29:55 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix problems due to use of "outb" to port 80 on
some AMD64x2 laptops, etc.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:13:46 -0800
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Fri 2007-12-14 10:02:57, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>> wow, cool fix! (I remember that there were other systems as well that are
> >>> affected by port 0x80 muckery - i thought we had removed port 0x80
> >>> accesses long ago.)
> >>> how about the simpler fix below, as a first-level approach? We can then
> >>> remove the _p in/out sequences after this.
> >> I believe this will suffer from the issue that was raised: this will use
> >> udelay() long before loop calibration (and no, we can't just "be
> >> conservative" since there is no "conservative" value we can use.)
> >
> > ?? Just initialize bogomips to 6GHz equivalent... and we are fine
> > until 6GHz cpus come out.
>
> How long will that take to boot on a 386?
Well the dumb approach to fix that would seem to be to initialise it to
cpu->family 3 -> 50MHz 4 -> 300Mhz 5-> etc...
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists