[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071215142929.5462b329@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:29:29 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix problems due to use of "outb" to port 80 on
some AMD64x2 laptops, etc.
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:27:25 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > The issue is -- how do you safely replace the outb pre-loops_per_jiffy
> > calibration? I'm currently running with the attached hack (not
> > submitted, only for 32-bit and discussion) the idea of which might be
> > the best we can do?
>
> how about doing a known-NOP chipset cycle? For example:
>
> inb(PIC_SLAVE_IMR)
It needs tobe a different chip to the main one (or macrocell anyway) - so
PIC for PIT and vice versa. However since we know 0x80 works for
everything on the planet but this one specifies of laptop which seems to
need a firmware update its a very high risk approach.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists