linux-kernel - Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47641B0F.3040709@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:21:03 -0800
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, protasnb@...il.com
Subject: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week

Stefan Richter wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> The http://www.kerneloops.org website collects kernel oops and warning
>> reports from various mailing lists and bugzillas;
> 
> A few comments:
> 
> Report counts may be too high due to duplicate recognition of the very
> same report.¹

this is true however it's .. a hard issue. It's really hard to distinguish a duplicate report from
two reports of the same bug.

> 
> Reports against 2.6.X-rcY-mmZ are listed in the same category as reports
> against 2.6.X-rcY.  To distinguish -mm reports from vanilla reports, one
> has to look into the details of each bug entry.¹

finding what exact kernel version an oops is from is... surprisingly hard.
And to be honest, bugs against -mm are still very interesting, since they'll be
the next mainline after all

> 
> A general weakness is that it is ultimately impossible to know whether a
> report was against an unpatched kernel, unless one drills down to the
> individual mailinglist threads.

for the same reason patched kernels are relevant. And if someone has a super weirdo kernel,
well, as long as we get enough bug data it'll be way down in the noise.


> Reports about tainted kernels have arguably less value.  It would be
> good to hide such reports until a report of the same oops in an
> untainted kernel was found.
That's half of what is done right now; they're not hidden though, just very clearly marked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/