[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <47643FF6.7030701@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:58:30 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New question on that sata controller
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> When I asked about a sata controller earlier this week, I gave a link to it.
> Unforch (maybe) when it actually arrived, the cards box showed a silicon
> image chip, and the card had a via. So much for getting what I ordered...
>
> The required module then was sata_via, not sata_uli, and it seems to be
> working ok. However, this one claims its a raid controller according to an
> lspci -v:
>
> 01:0a.0 RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6421 IDE RAID Controller
> (rev 50)
> Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6421 IDE RAID Controller
> Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 19
> I/O ports at 9400 [size=16]
> I/O ports at 9800 [size=16]
> I/O ports at 9c00 [size=16]
> I/O ports at a000 [size=16]
> I/O ports at a400 [size=32]
> I/O ports at a800 [size=256]
> [virtual] Expansion ROM at e9000000 [disabled] [size=64K]
> Capabilities: [e0] Power Management version 2
>
> I just noted that the Expansion ROM is disabled, but I didn't see any jumpers
> to enable it on the card prior to installing it. Does anyone know how this
> is supposed to work? I would like to make it directly bootable but I believe
> this has to be 'enabled' for that.
It's usually normal for it to be disabled after boot, I believe. Are you
getting anything showing up on boot indicating its BIOS is active?
>
> I cannot find any references to this particular chip in a 'make xconfig' for
> 2.6.24-rc5.
>
> Should this be a concern, or is this one a 'Just Works(TM)' chipset? This
> card has 3 sata port connectors and one ide fitted.
>
> Two rather pleasant side effects of going to the Biostar.tw site and finding a
> newer bios and installing it on an M7NCD Pro mobo are:
>
> 1: FSB now running at 400MHZ, was 333 before as it was not at all stable at
> 400 and I have been told the XP-2800 Athlon only supports 333 and AMD's site
> agrees.
>
> 2: CPU temps are down around 13F. CPU speed still the same at 2079MHZ
> according to dmesg.
>
> The reduced temps at a higher FSB indicates better interface timing, and if it
> runs the rest of the night at 400 without a self reboot or crash, I'll leave
> it there.
>
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists