[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712162010.11028.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:10:10 +0100
From: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1: problems with cat /proc/kpageflags
Witam,
> > > > cat /proc/kpageflags on sparc64 causes the box to lock.
> > > > I can not write on any terminal - but I can issue sysrqs and switch
> > > > between consoles.
> > > >
> > > > cat process hangs in read(3, ...
> > >
> > > cat /proc/kpagecount produces similar symptoms. box is locked - sysrq-w sshd trace:
> > >
> > > __down
> > > __down_interruptible
> > > kobject_get
> > > lock_kernel
> > > chrdev_open
> > > __dentry_open
> > > nameidata_to_filp
> > > open_pathname
> > > do_sys_open
> > > sparc32_open
> > > linux_sparc_syscall32
> >
> > Perhaps this is related to sparsemem.
> >
> > Can you change line 710 of fs/proc/proc_misc.c to:
> >
> > ppage = NULL;
>
> Sure.
>
> > ..and see if it still breaks?
>
> Yes it does - the same way as eariler. Box is locked, processes stuck in D state
> and after a while "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s!".
My mistake. I run cat /proc/kpageflags in the first place - so how could anything change :)
cat /proc/kpagecount on the other hand - with the change in line 710 - locks the box.
Sysrq works, changing consoles works, but there is no "BUG: soft lockup ..." message.
After a while the box becomes totaly unresponsive - even caps lock doesn't work, no
responses to ping.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists