[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712161213.15701.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:13:15 +0100
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: Larry Finger <larry.finger@...inger.net>
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@...ts.berlios.de, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@...aau.dk>,
matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jonathan@...masters.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
kjwinchester@...il.com, linux@...mer.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex
On Sunday 16 December 2007 03:30:16 Larry Finger wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
> > On Sunday 16 December 2007 00:18:43 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> Well, the only problem with that is I suspect there are some "newer" cards that
> >> work better with v3 firmware, although they are supposed to support both.
> >
> > And I suspect that you are wrong until you show me one. :)
>
> The BCM4311/1 card used to work better with bcm43xx than it did with b43; however, since the power
> control problem was "solved" in b43, there is very little difference. When I built my special system
> to use the BCM4311 with b43legacy, there was no difference.
>
> I don't know of any cards that work better with bcm43xx than with b43. Of course, that is comparing
> SoftMAC with mac80211. There is, of course, no comparison.
This was about version 3 firmware vs version 4 firmware.
I doubt the firmware makes any difference at all.
--
Greetings Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists