linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] [RFC] Simple tamper-proof device filesystem.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200712170040.lBH0e6sf099887@www262.sakura.ne.jp>
Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:40:06 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To:	"\"\\\"Indan Zupancic\\\"\"" <indan@....nu>
Cc:	david@...idnewall.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] [RFC] Simple tamper-proof device filesystem.

Hello.

Indan Zupancic wrote:
> What prevents them from mounting tmpfs on top of /dev, bypassing your fs?
Mandatory access control (MAC) prevents them from mounting tmpfs on top of /dev .
MAC mediates namespace manipulation requests such as mount()/umount().

> Also, if they have root there are plenty of ways to prevent an administrator
> from logging in, e.g. using iptables or changing the password.
MAC mediates execution of /sbin/iptables or /usr/bin/passwd .

So, use of this filesystem alone is meaningless because
attackers with root privileges can do what you are saying.
But use of this filesystem with MAC is still valid because
MAC can prevent attackers with root privileges from doing what you are saying.

Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/