[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4766684D.40202@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:15:09 +0100
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Paul Rolland <rol@...917.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
rol@...be.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.
On 17-12-07 11:57, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> thanks Rene! I've added your patch to x86.git. I changed a few things
> ontop of it, see the additional changelog and delta patch below.
"appropriated it", more. Definitely not going to forgive you for deleting
that comment.
> void native_io_delay(void)
> {
> - io_delay();
> + switch (io_delay_type) {
That's the clumsy bit. native_io_delay() used to be an inline outb, now it's
a switch. Yes, sure, versus an indirect call it's not actually worse, except
as an uglification.
> -#ifndef CONFIG_UDELAY_IO_DELAY
> -static int __init dmi_alternate_io_delay_port(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
> +static int __init dmi_io_delay_0xed_port(const struct dmi_system_id *id)
> {
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: using alternate I/O delay port\n", id->ident);
> - io_delay = alternate_io_delay;
> + printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: using 0xed I/O delay port\n", id->ident);
> + io_delay_type = CONFIG_IO_DELAY_TYPE_0XED;
> +
> return 0;
> }
This isn't correct. DMI shouldn't override the CONFIG choice or someone with
matching DMI will have a defective CONFIG option. That's why I put all of it
inside #ifndef.
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists