linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071217161008.GC7882@cvg.cvg>
Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:10:08 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: make pda's cpunumber and nodenumber unsigned

[Ingo Molnar - Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 05:01:27PM +0100]
| 
| * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
| 
| > Checkpatch still does complain about
| > 	if (0) { T__ tmp__; tmp__ = (val)
| > I'm not sure if we need this line at all.
| 
| that's a type-checking trick. It does not result in any generated code 
| but gcc flags it with a build time warning if there's a type mismatch. 
| So it's a checkpatch.pl false positive.
| 
| 	Ingo
| 

Thanks Ingo!

I'll fetch up the tree you mentoined in prev letter and next time
try to be more carefull with patches I'm sending (i'm a bit busy
with my second machine on which i'm trying to install fc8 but
anaconda hangs again and again so that is the reason I'm not sync'ed
with x86 and mm trees yet, sorry)

		Cyrill

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/