[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4765D95C.4010404@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:05:16 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Rolland <rol@...917.net>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
rol@...be.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.
Rene Herman wrote:
> On 16-12-07 16:22, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> looks good to me. Could you please also provide three more controls
>> that i suggested earlier:
>>
>> - a boot option enabling/disabling the udelay based code
>> - a .config method of enabling/disabling the udelay based code
>> - a sysctl to toggle it
>>
>> if we want to clean this all up we'll need as many controls as possible.
>
> This version does the boot and the .config option but not the sysctl. It
> makes for clumsy code and I don't believe it provides for much added
> value as soon as you have the boot option. I am moreover not completely
> confident about things such as paravirt liking the possibility of the
> native_io_delay being changed out from under them at unpredictable times.
>
Incidentally, I had the thought earlier today that port 0xf0 might be a
suitable delay port. It is used only by the 387-emulating-a-287 hack
for IRQ 13, which Linux doesn't use on 486+.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists