linux-kernel - Re: Final kprobes rollup patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1197922639.23402.13.camel@brick>
Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:17:19 -0800
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@...ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <hiramatu@....hitachi.co.jp>,
	Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@...el.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Final kprobes rollup patches

On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 17:06 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > > cool! Please Cc: lkml and Harvey as well so that there's less 
> > > overlap in unification work - Harvey spent quite some time unifying 
> > > and cleaning up the kprobes code during the past week.
> > 
> > Should I rewrite it based on current git tree?
> > My patch includes 3 part of patches.
> > - 2 Bugfix patches (which is not merged yet.)
> > - 2 booster patches (ditto)
> > - 2 unification patches (most of this patches are already done by Harvey's patch)
> 
> would it be easier/more robust to first did the unification patches and 
> then get the bugfixes and new features in? That would give us your 
> bugfixes and new features on both 32-bit and 64-bit at the same time.
> 
> feel free to do whichever approach you prefer - but it would be nice to 
> preserve the unification and cleanup work done by Harvey.
> 
> btw., is any of your bugfixes 2.6.24 material?
> 

Well, I'll admit to being a little disappointed if my work doesn't make
it in, but there are bugfixes here.  I think my cleanup breakout is
better in the more-finegrained changes sense.  If you decide to keep
mine I'll rebase Masami's patches 1-4 on top of that and send it by
him for resubmittal.  But I'll leave it to Ingo to decide how
to procede.

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/