linux-kernel - RE: /dev/urandom uses uninit bytes, leaks user data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKAELOIOAC.davids@webmaster.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:59:04 -0800
From:	"David Schwartz" <davids@...master.com>
To:	"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>, <jreiser@...wagon.com>
Cc:	"Matt Mackall" <mpm@...enic.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<security@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: /dev/urandom uses uninit bytes, leaks user data


> The bottom line:  At a cost of at most three unpredictable branches
> (whether to clear the bytes in the last word with indices congruent
> to 1, 2, or 3 modulo 4), then the code can reduce the risk from something
> small but positive, to zero.  This is very inexpensive insurance.

> John Reiser, jreiser@...Wagon.com

Even if you're right, the change isn't free. You've simply presented
evidence of one non-zero benefit of it. You've given no ability to assess
the size of this benefit and no way to figure if it exceeds the cost. There
is also a non-zero *security* cost to this change.

DS


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/