linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <520b60a90712171512vcab7fb6of7732466ccb85996@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:12:30 -0500
From:	mvtodevnull@...il.com
To:	"Michael Buesch" <mb@...sch.de>
Cc:	"Larry Finger" <larry.finger@...inger.net>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...sta.com>,
	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
	"Simon Holm Thøgersen" <odie@...aau.dk>,
	matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@...mer.net, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	kjwinchester@...il.com, jonathan@...masters.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bcm43xx-dev@...ts.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex

On Dec 17, 2007 5:45 PM, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de> wrote:
>
> Ehm, excuse me.
> What are you doing exactly? In this thread you told me you have
> a device which requires b43:
>

Well, I'm not sure what you mean by "requires" b43, but I did say that
the device uses the b43 driver.

> > I don't know what happened before, but after a reboot, I can't repeat
> > the 200 kB/s speed. It's back down to 40 kB/s, just like originally. I
> > didn't move the laptop, or the ap, the only thing I can think of that
> > might have changed is the noise level. FWIW, link quality is
> > consistently the same or better with b43.
>
> How the hell can you now "force it to use b43legacy"??
>

Sorry, I should have been more specific. I figured since the device
could use bcm43xx, it could also use b43legacy, so I copied the
entries in b43_ssb_tbl[] to b43legacy_ssb_tbl[] and rebuilt the
b43legacy driver. I removed the b43 and ssb modules, and inserted the
b43legacy module. Afterwards, I noticed b43 had still been autoloaded,
so I removed it (I checked dmesg and only b43legacy had initialized
anyway) , and proceeded to use the b43legacy driver with the version 3
firmware. And like I said, it works exactly like the b43 driver with
the version 4 firmware.

I'm not sure if it was the best way to go about it, but it worked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/