linux-kernel - Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071217025129.GA12815@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 16 Dec 2007 21:51:29 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation>, protasnb@...il.com
Subject: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week

On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 04:49:05PM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
 
 > Reports about tainted kernels have arguably less value.  It would be
 > good to hide such reports until a report of the same oops in an
 > untainted kernel was found.
 
I disagree with this.  It's useful to have a "we've seen this before,
and every time, it was tainted with xyz module" datapoint, especially
if no untainted copies of that oops turn up.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/