linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/9] readahead: clean up and simplify the code for filemap page fault readahead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071218081907.GB32114@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:19:07 +0100
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] readahead: clean up and simplify the code for filemap page fault readahead

On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:59:30PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:

> @@ -1321,78 +1401,69 @@ int filemap_fault(struct vm_area_struct 
>  	struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
>  	struct file_ra_state *ra = &file->f_ra;
>  	struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> +	pgoff_t offset = vmf->pgoff;
>  	struct page *page;
>  	unsigned long size;
> -	int did_readaround = 0;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	size = (i_size_read(inode) + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>  	if (vmf->pgoff >= size)
>  		return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>  
> -	/* If we don't want any read-ahead, don't bother */
> -	if (VM_RandomReadHint(vma))
> -		goto no_cached_page;
> -
>  	/*
> -	 * Do we have something in the page cache already?
> +	 * Do we have something in the page cache already that
> +	 * is unlocked and already up-to-date?
>  	 */
> -retry_find:
> -	page = find_lock_page(mapping, vmf->pgoff);
> -	/*
> -	 * For sequential accesses, we use the generic readahead logic.
> -	 */
> -	if (VM_SequentialReadHint(vma)) {
> -		if (!page) {
> -			page_cache_sync_readahead(mapping, ra, file,
> -							   vmf->pgoff, 1);
> -			page = find_lock_page(mapping, vmf->pgoff);
> -			if (!page)
> -				goto no_cached_page;
> -		}
> -		if (PageReadahead(page)) {
> -			page_cache_async_readahead(mapping, ra, file, page,
> -							   vmf->pgoff, 1);
> -		}
> -	}
> +	read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> +	page = radix_tree_lookup(&mapping->page_tree, offset);
> +	if (likely(page)) {
> +		int got_lock, uptodate;
> +		page_cache_get(page);
> +
> +		got_lock = !TestSetPageLocked(page);
> +		uptodate = PageUptodate(page);
> +		read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);

If we could avoid open coding tree_lock here (and expanding its coverage
to PageUptodate), that would be nice. I don't think it gains us too much.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/