linux-kernel - Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:11:15 -0500
From:	Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, protasnb@...il.com
Subject: Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week


On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 21:31 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 04:21:12PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > which also gets bonus points for being totally unreadable, and thus 100% 
> > in the spirit of uuid's.
> 
> Heh.  UUID's don't have to be readable; just universally unique.  Code
> on the other hand should be readable.   :-)
> 
> If you want something more readable, you could print the MAC address
> and boot time.  Of course some crazy people seem to think leaking the
> MAC address will somehow be a privacy violation.  And printing a
> random UUID is a lot simpler....

Printing a random UUID is necessary, for now anyway, because you cannot
assume every machine is going to have a MAC address, even if it is
deemed appropriate to print this on oops.

The Network is the Computer!

Jon.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/