linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] atmel_serial: Clean up the code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071218113337.061a8e59@dhcp-252-066.norway.atmel.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:33:37 +0100
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	"Remy Bohmer" <linux@...mer.net>
Cc:	"Andrew Victor" <linux@...im.org.za>,
	"ARM Linux Mailing List" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] atmel_serial: Clean up the code

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:14:42 +0100
"Remy Bohmer" <linux@...mer.net> wrote:

> Hello Haavard,
> 
> > Please note that I'm not trying to steal the show here -- I just want
> 
> That did not even come to my mind at all...
> I am happy with everything that helps making this driver better.

Good :)

> What shall we do first from here, splitup of the interrupt handler? Or
> DMA patch?

I currently have the patches applied in the order you sent them, with my
stuff wedged in between (thanks to git-rebase --interactive.) So I
think it makes sense to do the interrupt handler splitup first, even
though I personally care more about the DMA patch.

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/