| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071218110847.GB4193@2ka.mipt.ru> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:08:47 +0300 From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> To: David Chinner <dgc@....com> Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [0/4] DST: Distributed storage. Hi David. On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 12:00:04PM +1100, David Chinner (dgc@....com) wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 06:03:38PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > DST passed all FS tests in LTP with XFS (modulo MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low bug: > > [ 8398.605691] BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low! > > [ 8398.609641] turning off the locking correctness validator. > > Evgeniy, can you please start reporting these XFS problems you are > coming across to the XFS list (xfs@....sgi.com)? They may be > real issues that we need to address and we should not be hearing > about them for the first time in the release notes for a block > device project.... It is not XFS as is, but lock validator warning. I just found it working with XFS - it can be anything else: VFS, block layer, DST itself (there is number of locks too), so I did not fill the bug against filesystem, but pointed that some problem, probalby harmless, exists in tested environment. -- Evgeniy Polyakov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists