| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071218154415.GA12238@elte.hu> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:44:15 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, glommer@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, ehabkost@...hat.com, jeremy@...p.org, avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, ak@...e.de, chrisw@...s-sol.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, hpa@...or.com, zach@...are.com, roland@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration * Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote: >> >>> yes, our include file dependencies are a jungle, the differences between >>> 32-bit and 64-bit are arbitrary in 80% of the cases, but still there's no >>> reason why this couldnt be done correctly. The patch below is a quick >>> bandaid that adds the missing bits. >> >> the bandaid didnt work - so i removed the 21/21 patch for the time being. > > I will also have updates for other patches, If you want, you can drop > the series entirely, and wait for the new one to come please send delta patches for this lot from now on - those are a lot more testable. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists