[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1J4jSf-00024X-GN@faramir.fjphome.nl>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:54:45 +0100
From: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc: ak@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
avi@...ranet.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org, ehabkost@...hat.com,
gcosta@...hat.com, glommer@...il.com, hpa@...or.com,
jeremy@...p.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
roland@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
tglx@...utronix.de, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
zach@...are.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> What's left in processor_32.h and processor_64.h cannot be cleanly
> integrated. However, it's just a couple of definitions. They are moved
> to processor.h around ifdefs, and the original files are deleted. Note
> that there's much less headers included in the final version.
Either I must be missing something or this patch was corrupted somehow.
I see:
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
[...]
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
While I'd have expected:
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
[...]
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_32 */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
[...]
+#endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists