| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071218210233.GA23855@elte.hu> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:02:33 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com> Cc: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>, ak@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, anthony@...emonkey.ws, avi@...ranet.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org, ehabkost@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, jeremy@...p.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, roland@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tglx@...utronix.de, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, zach@...are.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] finish processor.h integration * Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com> wrote: > On Dec 18, 2007 6:54 PM, Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl> wrote: > > Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > > > What's left in processor_32.h and processor_64.h cannot be cleanly > > > integrated. However, it's just a couple of definitions. They are moved > > > to processor.h around ifdefs, and the original files are deleted. Note > > > that there's much less headers included in the final version. > > > > Either I must be missing something or this patch was corrupted somehow. > > neither. > Note the else in the middle. It's just a mistake in the comment. > Ingo, do you want me to send an update with it ? no need, i'll pick up the current patches. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists