linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/9] tmpfs: allow filepage alongside swappage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200712182251.lBIMpUbp030364@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:51:30 -0500
From:	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Rohland <hans-christoph.rohland@....com>,
	Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] tmpfs: allow filepage alongside swappage 

In message <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712182200230.27165@...nde.wat.veritas.com>, Hugh Dickins writes:

>  redirty:
>  	set_page_dirty(page);
> -	return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE;	/* Return with the page locked */
> +	if (wbc->for_reclaim)
> +		return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE;	/* Return with page locked */
> +	unlock_page(page);
> +	return 0;

Just curious, but didn't you (or someone else) mention that they wanted to
do away with AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE entirely?  If these patches are for
2.6.25, would that be the right time?

Erez.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/